Plans cover fire and nothing else
Fire is one scenario. Serious injury, hazardous substance release, structural collapse, earthquake, and a person unaccounted for all need a response, and each is different.
Regulation 14 does not just require an emergency plan — it requires communication procedures, testing of those procedures, and instruction for the workers who have to use them. This template covers all three, not only the first.
Instant download · Editable .docx
Most emergency plans in circulation are an evacuation diagram and a muster point. Regulation 14 of the GRWM Regulations 2016 asks for more than that: the plan must include procedures for effective communication between the person coordinating the emergency response and everyone else at the workplace, it must provide for testing of the emergency procedures, and it must provide for information, training and instruction to relevant workers on implementing them. A diagram on a wall satisfies none of those three.
Fire is one scenario. Serious injury, hazardous substance release, structural collapse, earthquake, and a person unaccounted for all need a response, and each is different.
Regulation 14 requires the plan to provide for testing of the procedures. An untested plan is an assumption, and the test record is what evidences compliance.
The regulation is built around a person authorised to coordinate the response. If that role is not named, with a deputy, the communication procedures have no centre.
This is the workplace emergency plan. Building evacuation schemes approved under the Fire and Emergency New Zealand framework are a separate regulatory process.
Word — 24 pages (plan + scenario cards + test records) · Formats: DOCX
Regulation 14 requires a PCBU to ensure an emergency plan is prepared for the workplace, and specifies content that most templates omit. Each requirement is mapped to the section that carries it.
Written and reviewed by the occupational health and safety team at OH Consultant. Regulation 14 is unusual among the general-risk regulations in specifying content, and the three specified items — communication, testing, instruction — are precisely the ones absent from most plans in circulation. The template is built around them rather than around the evacuation diagram.