Officers are asked to sign off on risks they cannot see
A 200-line hazard register is not a governance instrument. The critical-risk view in this register is deliberately short and reportable.
The business-level register that sits above your hazard register — critical risks, named owners, treatment plans with dates, and a governance view an officer can actually use to discharge the section 44 duty.
Instant download · Editable .docx + .xlsx
A hazard register tells you what could hurt someone on the tools today. It does not tell a director whether the business is carrying its critical risks well. Section 44 of HSWA places a personal duty on officers to exercise due diligence — including acquiring knowledge of the hazards and risks, and verifying that resources and processes are provided and used. That duty is discharged against a small number of critical risks with named owners and a reporting rhythm, which is what this register is built to hold.
A 200-line hazard register is not a governance instrument. The critical-risk view in this register is deliberately short and reportable.
Every entry carries a named owner, a treatment plan, a due date and a review cycle. Ownership is a field, not an assumption.
Regulatory, commercial and reputational exposure sit alongside health and safety risk in the same register, because they are managed by the same people at the same table.
This is the governance-level register. Operational hazards and their controls belong in the hazard register.
Excel — 4 sheets; Word — 10 pages (framework + reporting pack) · Formats: XLSX, DOCX
The register is structured around the officer due-diligence duty, because that is the duty a governance-level risk register exists to discharge.
Written and reviewed by the occupational health and safety team at OH Consultant. The critical-risk and critical-control structure follows the approach that has become standard in higher-hazard New Zealand industries, scaled down so that a business with twenty staff can run it without a dedicated risk function.