Silica treated as nuisance dust
Dry cutting a slab is one of the highest silica exposures in construction. Water suppression and on-tool extraction are engineering controls and they come before respiratory protection, not instead of it.
Three distinct risk profiles in one trade — wet concrete and pump lines during the pour, respirable silica during cutting and grinding, and suspended mass during precast and tilt panel work.
Instant download · Editable .docx
Concreting is usually written up as a manual handling and slip hazard, which misses both of the things most likely to cause serious or lasting harm. Cutting, grinding and breaking cured concrete releases respirable crystalline silica, and the resulting disease is irreversible. Precast and tilt panel work involves suspended loads measured in tonnes with a small exclusion zone and a short window in which temporary propping is doing all the work. This JSA separates the three phases so the controls match the actual risk of each.
Dry cutting a slab is one of the highest silica exposures in construction. Water suppression and on-tool extraction are engineering controls and they come before respiratory protection, not instead of it.
A blocked line holds stored energy. Clearing it without depressurising is how hoses whip and end fittings become projectiles.
Between landing a panel and permanent connection, the props are the structure. Their design, installation and the ban on removing them early belong in the analysis.
Formwork at height, excavation for footings, and crane operations each carry their own analysis.
Word — 16 pages (three-phase JSA + silica controls + forms) · Formats: DOCX
A Job Safety Analysis is not a named statutory document in New Zealand — unlike an Australian SWMS, no regulation requires one by that name. Its weight comes from the duties it discharges, and from the fact that main contractors and prequalification schemes treat it as the expected evidence that a high-risk task was thought through before it started.
The most common alternative in New Zealand is an Australian SWMS with the branding changed. It is worth being precise about why that is a problem.
Written and reviewed by the occupational health and safety team at OH Consultant. These are drafted as New Zealand Job Safety Analyses, not as Australian SWMS with the terminology swapped. That distinction is substantive: a SWMS is an instrument created by Australian WHS regulation for high-risk construction work, with prescribed content and a statutory trigger. New Zealand has no equivalent provision, so a document presented as a "NZ SWMS" is citing a requirement that does not exist here.