Harness first, edge protection never
A harness is personal protective equipment — the bottom of Regulation 6. If edge protection or a platform was reasonably practicable, choosing a harness needs justifying, not assuming.
The task-level analysis for fall risk — edge protection before harnesses, harnesses before ladders, and the notification threshold that catches people out at five metres.
Instant download · Editable .docx
Falls remain the largest single source of serious harm in New Zealand construction, and the pattern in the investigations is consistent: the fall protection selected sat far too low on the hierarchy. A harness was used where edge protection was practicable. A ladder was used where a platform was practicable. This JSA is structured so the control decision is made in the right order and the reason for not going higher up the hierarchy has to be written down.
A harness is personal protective equipment — the bottom of Regulation 6. If edge protection or a platform was reasonably practicable, choosing a harness needs justifying, not assuming.
A harness attached to something that will not hold is worse than no harness, because it changes behaviour. The template requires the anchor to be identified and rated.
Construction work with a risk of falling five metres or more is particular hazardous work requiring 24 hours notice to WorkSafe. The JSA flags it at planning rather than after the fact.
Scaffolding erection and dismantling is its own task with its own analysis, and confined space at height needs both documents.
Word — 14 pages (pre-populated JSA + notification guidance + forms) · Formats: DOCX
A Job Safety Analysis is not a named statutory document in New Zealand — unlike an Australian SWMS, no regulation requires one by that name. Its weight comes from the duties it discharges, and from the fact that main contractors and prequalification schemes treat it as the expected evidence that a high-risk task was thought through before it started.
The most common alternative in New Zealand is an Australian SWMS with the branding changed. It is worth being precise about why that is a problem.
Written and reviewed by the occupational health and safety team at OH Consultant. These are drafted as New Zealand Job Safety Analyses, not as Australian SWMS with the terminology swapped. That distinction is substantive: a SWMS is an instrument created by Australian WHS regulation for high-risk construction work, with prescribed content and a statutory trigger. New Zealand has no equivalent provision, so a document presented as a "NZ SWMS" is citing a requirement that does not exist here.