Services located on a plan, not on the ground
As-builts are frequently wrong. Locating, potholing and proving by hand before the machine starts is the control that prevents strikes.
Service location before the bucket moves, ground assessed before anyone enters, and the two thresholds that turn an ordinary trench into notifiable work.
Instant download · Editable .docx
A cubic metre of soil weighs well over a tonne, and collapse gives no warning — which is why an unsupported trench that looks stable is the most dangerous thing on most civil sites. The second risk is what is already buried in it. This JSA sequences both: services located and proven before mechanical excavation begins, ground assessed and supported before anyone enters, and the notification thresholds checked at planning rather than discovered mid-dig.
As-builts are frequently wrong. Locating, potholing and proving by hand before the machine starts is the control that prevents strikes.
Soil type, water, surcharge from spoil and plant, and previous disturbance all change what is stable. The template records the ground assessment behind the decision.
Work in a trench more than 1.5 metres deep and deeper than its width at the top is notifiable, and so separately is an excavation face over 5 metres at a steep slope. Both are checked here.
Deep excavations frequently become confined spaces, and road corridor work needs traffic management approval before anything else happens.
Word — 15 pages (pre-populated JSA + service check + forms) · Formats: DOCX
A Job Safety Analysis is not a named statutory document in New Zealand — unlike an Australian SWMS, no regulation requires one by that name. Its weight comes from the duties it discharges, and from the fact that main contractors and prequalification schemes treat it as the expected evidence that a high-risk task was thought through before it started.
The most common alternative in New Zealand is an Australian SWMS with the branding changed. It is worth being precise about why that is a problem.
Written and reviewed by the occupational health and safety team at OH Consultant. These are drafted as New Zealand Job Safety Analyses, not as Australian SWMS with the terminology swapped. That distinction is substantive: a SWMS is an instrument created by Australian WHS regulation for high-risk construction work, with prescribed content and a statutory trigger. New Zealand has no equivalent provision, so a document presented as a "NZ SWMS" is citing a requirement that does not exist here.