Blank templates produce weak controls
Given an empty control column, people write "take care" and "use PPE". A hierarchy-of-control field forces the question of whether the hazard could have been designed out instead.
The generic template the rest of the line is built on: blank forms plus two fully worked examples, with the step-hazard-control structure and the hierarchy-of-control field that most blank JSAs leave out.
Instant download · Editable .docx
Search for a JSA template in New Zealand and you get two things: a blank grid with four column headings, or an Australian SWMS with the branding changed. The blank grid leaves you to invent the method, which is why so many completed JSAs list "be careful" as a control. The Australian document cites a regulation that has no New Zealand equivalent. This template is the third option — the structure written out properly, in New Zealand terms, with worked examples showing what a usable JSA actually looks like.
Given an empty control column, people write "take care" and "use PPE". A hierarchy-of-control field forces the question of whether the hazard could have been designed out instead.
A task broken into three steps hides the hazards. The guidance shows how far to break a task down before the analysis starts producing real findings.
A JSA developed away from the crew and handed over gets signed, not used. The sign-on and pre-start structure is built around the crew being in the room.
If your task is one of the trades covered specifically, that version comes pre-populated with the hazards and steps and will save you more time.
Word — 16 pages (forms + 2 worked examples + guidance) · Formats: DOCX
A Job Safety Analysis is not a named statutory document in New Zealand — unlike an Australian SWMS, no regulation requires one by that name. Its weight comes from the duties it discharges, and from the fact that main contractors and prequalification schemes treat it as the expected evidence that a high-risk task was thought through before it started.
The most common alternative in New Zealand is an Australian SWMS with the branding changed. It is worth being precise about why that is a problem.
Written and reviewed by the occupational health and safety team at OH Consultant. These are drafted as New Zealand Job Safety Analyses, not as Australian SWMS with the terminology swapped. That distinction is substantive: a SWMS is an instrument created by Australian WHS regulation for high-risk construction work, with prescribed content and a statutory trigger. New Zealand has no equivalent provision, so a document presented as a "NZ SWMS" is citing a requirement that does not exist here.