The wrong circuit gets isolated
Board labelling is frequently wrong, especially in older and altered installations. Proving dead at the point of work is what catches it, and it is the step most often skipped.
Isolation, lock-out, and proving dead at the point of work — with live work treated as the exception that has to be justified in writing rather than the shortcut that gets taken because the board is in another building.
Instant download · Editable .docx
Electrical fatalities in New Zealand cluster around a small number of failures, and they are not exotic: the wrong circuit was isolated, the isolation was not proven dead at the point of work, someone else re-energised the circuit, or the work was done live because isolating was inconvenient. This JSA is built around those four, with the test-prove-test sequence and the lock-out record as required fields rather than assumed practice.
Board labelling is frequently wrong, especially in older and altered installations. Proving dead at the point of work is what catches it, and it is the step most often skipped.
Isolation without a personal lock and tag is an arrangement, not a control. The template records the lock, the tag and who holds the key.
Working live because de-energising would disrupt the tenant is a decision that needs to be made deliberately, documented, and controlled — not arrived at on site.
Electrical work at height or in a confined space needs the additional analysis for those conditions — the hazards compound rather than substitute.
Word — 15 pages (pre-populated JSA + isolation records + forms) · Formats: DOCX
A Job Safety Analysis is not a named statutory document in New Zealand — unlike an Australian SWMS, no regulation requires one by that name. Its weight comes from the duties it discharges, and from the fact that main contractors and prequalification schemes treat it as the expected evidence that a high-risk task was thought through before it started.
The most common alternative in New Zealand is an Australian SWMS with the branding changed. It is worth being precise about why that is a problem.
Written and reviewed by the occupational health and safety team at OH Consultant. These are drafted as New Zealand Job Safety Analyses, not as Australian SWMS with the terminology swapped. That distinction is substantive: a SWMS is an instrument created by Australian WHS regulation for high-risk construction work, with prescribed content and a statutory trigger. New Zealand has no equivalent provision, so a document presented as a "NZ SWMS" is citing a requirement that does not exist here.